ARCHIVE: Discussion: Spoilers/Rumors - 12

Magnolia_3.0 wrote:

Jakku wrote:She didn't say that this was the most important line, just that she was revealing a part of the script.

I don't get what's 'bad taste' about that, or the quote in the article?

@Jakku

I meant that when Daisy mentioned this part of the script, it gave a lot of room to several interpretations, especially of the antis, that did not add up to anything, so it would have been better if she did not say anything!

@Magnolia_3.0

She's an actress who is inevitably going to be asked these questions, again and again, and has been given media training to reveal as little as possible while keeping interest high. She can't just say nothing - remember, she described her early media training with a role play where she was asked if she could talk about something to do with TFA and just said 'No'....and everyone leapt up and down telling her she couldn't say that. So what would you have her do?

When it comes to fan schisms, LFL are eager to feed divisions. It keeps interest high.

What line did Daisy think was the most important line?

Gemini wrote:What line did Daisy think was the most important line?

@Gemini

She didn't say it was an important line. She was asked if she could reveal just a tiny bit of the script, and said that she'd give away something she would say in the film. Then she said "I".

As the chances of any character not using the word "I" many times are small, it wasn't much of a spoiler.

DarthRen wrote:If true then it's Luke unless Daisy is just playing with words.

http://screencrush.com/ridley-rey-parents-obvious-ep-7/?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_1331319

@DarthRen

It's not Luke. Tfa answers the question though, she is not trolling. Tfa quite clearly tells you who she is. And I'm with her in the whole flabbergasted that people didn't see it/still don't see it. Absolutely stunned.

Jakku wrote:

Gemini wrote:What line did Daisy think was the most important line?

@Gemini

She didn't say it was an important line. She was asked if she could reveal just a tiny bit of the script, and said that she'd give away something she would say in the film. Then she said "I".

As the chances of any character not using the word "I" many times are small, it wasn't much of a spoiler.

@Jakku

"Luke, I am not your daughter"

Fanboys - "nooooooooi that's impossible!"

What's more interesting is that Daisy says the answer will raise more questions to keep us all busy


It's just so obvious lol

I can't see how rey random will raise questions to keep us busy for years to come

TFA doesn't tell you who her parents are - only who they aren't. This is done several ways; first through her conversation with Maz (family isn't coming back, and belonging is ahead), and second, the sexual subtext between her and Kylo.

I think it's very possible she's a Kenobi, but I wouldn't go as far to say TFA showed us that without a doubt.

IoJovi wrote:TFA doesn't tell you who her parents are - only who they aren't.  This is done several ways; first through her conversation with Maz (family isn't coming back, and belonging is ahead), and second, the sexual subtext between her and Kylo.  

I think it's very possible she's a Kenobi, but I wouldn't go as far to say TFA showed us that without a doubt.  

@IoJovi


I see where people are coming from and I agree that it's not 100 percent clear to many.

personalky I'm just confident with what film language is trying to say and I saw it immediately, in my own personal opinion, I would definitely say that the ending revealed who she is without saying a word. A scene can speak volumes and not a single word need be said. To me it's 100 percent set in stone with that ending. The film technique used there in regards to the saga does not allow it to mean anything else imo. I just can't see how it can.

I can't see why Daisy would say tfa answers a lot about her lineage if it didn't. It answers nothing with her parents so she can't mean that imo. She must mean the ending and other parallels.

Gemini wrote:

IoJovi wrote:TFA doesn't tell you who her parents are - only who they aren't.  This is done several ways; first through her conversation with Maz (family isn't coming back, and belonging is ahead), and second, the sexual subtext between her and Kylo.  

I think it's very possible she's a Kenobi, but I wouldn't go as far to say TFA showed us that without a doubt.  

@IoJovi


I see where people are coming from and I agree that it's not 100 percent clear to many.

personalky I'm just confident with what film language is trying to say and I saw it immediately, in my own personal opinion, I would definitely say that the ending revealed who she is without saying a word. A scene can speak volumes and not a single word need be said. To me it's 100 percent set in stone with that ending. The film technique used there in regards to the saga does not allow it to mean anything else imo. I just can't see how it can.

I can't see why Daisy would say tfa answers a lot about her lineage if it didn't. It answers nothing with her parents so she can't mean that imo. She must mean the ending and other parallels.

@Gemini

While I'm open to any parentage reveal for Rey as long as it's a good story, I do admit Daisy Ridley stating clues to her parentage being in TFA bodes well for the Kenobi theory, particularly if you think about the very last scene.

Then again, like others have said here, it could just be how she was coached and it's a way to keep people talking.

Of course the Reywalkers will jump all over this too *eyeroll*.

While I'm still not 100℅ sold on Kenobi (or any parentage theory, really), I do understand it feels to so adamntly know how the story is going to go, only to have others tell you you're seeing things. I saw Rogue One this week with a fanboy friend of mine. While I know in my heart of hearts Reylo is the solid end game for the trilogy, my friend insists we saw two different movies. He thinks I'm insane for even contemplating it, let alone being so sure.

I have presented to him all of the facts, clues, hints, reasoning, etc. and his only response is that it won't happen because he doesn't want that.

I'm not saying that's what's happening here when we debate parentage theories, but I do understand how you feel.

I don't really see how Daisy's quote points to her parentage. I mean, the article leads the readers to believe that "DR said her parentage was pretty obvious in TFA", but honestly, Daisy just said "something" she often gets asked about was actually pretty obvious in the movie. Her parentage isn't the only question raised about her, even if it's the most common. It could be anything, imho.

Irina de France wrote:I don't really see how Daisy's quote points to her parentage. I mean, the article leads the readers to believe that "DR said her parentage was pretty obvious in TFA", but honestly, Daisy just said "something" she often gets asked about was actually pretty obvious in the movie. Her parentage isn't the only question raised about her, even if it's the most common. It could be anything, imho.

@Irina de France

I just reread it and sure as sith, you are right. Rey's parentage wasn't the only thing hidden inside the mystery box. She could be pointing directly at Reylo with this quote as well.

I mean, if you see the attraction between those two characters, then it's a given Luke and Leia aren't her parents. Yet so many came out sure as can be about Reywalker...

IoJovi wrote:

Gemini wrote:

IoJovi wrote:TFA doesn't tell you who her parents are - only who they aren't.  This is done several ways; first through her conversation with Maz (family isn't coming back, and belonging is ahead), and second, the sexual subtext between her and Kylo.  

I think it's very possible she's a Kenobi, but I wouldn't go as far to say TFA showed us that without a doubt.  

@IoJovi


I see where people are coming from and I agree that it's not 100 percent clear to many.

personalky I'm just confident with what film language is trying to say and I saw it immediately, in my own personal opinion, I would definitely say that the ending revealed who she is without saying a word. A scene can speak volumes and not a single word need be said. To me it's 100 percent set in stone with that ending. The film technique used there in regards to the saga does not allow it to mean anything else imo. I just can't see how it can.

I can't see why Daisy would say tfa answers a lot about her lineage if it didn't. It answers nothing with her parents so she can't mean that imo. She must mean the ending and other parallels.

@Gemini

While I'm open to any parentage reveal for Rey as long as it's a good story, I do admit Daisy Ridley stating clues to her parentage being in TFA bodes well for the Kenobi theory, particularly if you think about the very last scene.

Then again, like others have said here, it could just be how she was coached and it's a way to keep people talking.

Of course the Reywalkers will jump all over this too *eyeroll*.

While I'm still not 100℅ sold on Kenobi (or any parentage theory, really), I do understand it feels to so adamntly know how the story is going to go, only to have others tell you you're seeing things. I saw Rogue One this week with a fanboy friend of mine. While I know in my heart of hearts Reylo is the solid end game for the trilogy, my friend insists we saw two different movies. He thinks I'm insane for even contemplating it, let alone being so sure.

I have presented to him all of the facts, clues, hints, reasoning, etc. and his only response is that it won't happen because he doesn't want that.

I'm not saying that's what's happening here when we debate parentage theories, but I do understand how you feel.

@IoJovi
This happened to me too! I have friends who do not buy the idea of Reylo, nor like all the theories I present. I'd like to see their faces when Reylo happens and ReySkywalker sink like the Titanic (I remembered a similar comment from Daisy ... this one I liked!) ... I love the actress Daisy, but there are some comments that unfortunately bring a lot of argument to The antis, and it saddens me ...

Gemini wrote:You gotta love how Daisy does not actually say her parents are in tfa. Look how much they twisted what was said. She implies that tfa answered a lot about her lineage. I'm pretty sure she never said her parents are in tfa

This is what she says: "I thought a lot was answered in The Force Awakens."

How the hell people think that means she's saying her parents are in tfa is beyond me.


Tfa does 2 things

1. Does not reveal her parents
2. Hints at rey kenobi with film language

So she's either random or kenobi imo

@Gemini

Most of the people and including me thought it's Rey Skywalker and not Kenobi. Not all people go and research thought the internet and they think Rey is Luke's daughter. How lightsaber called to her, it was Anakin's, Luke's and then Rey. They way they looked at each other at Ach-To and how they basically mirror each other upbringing in first movie.

Magnolia_3.0 wrote:

IoJovi wrote:

Gemini wrote:

IoJovi wrote:TFA doesn't tell you who her parents are - only who they aren't.  This is done several ways; first through her conversation with Maz (family isn't coming back, and belonging is ahead), and second, the sexual subtext between her and Kylo.  

I think it's very possible she's a Kenobi, but I wouldn't go as far to say TFA showed us that without a doubt.  

@IoJovi


I see where people are coming from and I agree that it's not 100 percent clear to many.

personalky I'm just confident with what film language is trying to say and I saw it immediately, in my own personal opinion, I would definitely say that the ending revealed who she is without saying a word. A scene can speak volumes and not a single word need be said. To me it's 100 percent set in stone with that ending. The film technique used there in regards to the saga does not allow it to mean anything else imo. I just can't see how it can.

I can't see why Daisy would say tfa answers a lot about her lineage if it didn't. It answers nothing with her parents so she can't mean that imo. She must mean the ending and other parallels.

@Gemini

While I'm open to any parentage reveal for Rey as long as it's a good story, I do admit Daisy Ridley stating clues to her parentage being in TFA bodes well for the Kenobi theory, particularly if you think about the very last scene.

Then again, like others have said here, it could just be how she was coached and it's a way to keep people talking.

Of course the Reywalkers will jump all over this too *eyeroll*.

While I'm still not 100℅ sold on Kenobi (or any parentage theory, really), I do understand it feels to so adamntly know how the story is going to go, only to have others tell you you're seeing things. I saw Rogue One this week with a fanboy friend of mine. While I know in my heart of hearts Reylo is the solid end game for the trilogy, my friend insists we saw two different movies. He thinks I'm insane for even contemplating it, let alone being so sure.

I have presented to him all of the facts, clues, hints, reasoning, etc. and his only response is that it won't happen because he doesn't want that.

I'm not saying that's what's happening here when we debate parentage theories, but I do understand how you feel.

@IoJovi
This happened to me too! I have friends who do not buy the idea of Reylo, nor like all the theories I present. I'd like to see their faces when Reylo happens and ReySkywalker sink like the Titanic (I remembered a similar comment from Daisy ... this one I liked!) ... I love the actress Daisy, but there are some comments that unfortunately bring a lot of argument to The antis, and it saddens me ...

@Magnolia_3.0

Exactly! And it becomes even more frustrating when Reylo gets more and more in your face and obvious with every viewing.

What's even worse, the counter arguments usually go about as deep as "I don't want that", "He killed Han" or "But they're related (insert call back to OT example here.)

IoJovi wrote:

Magnolia_3.0 wrote:

IoJovi wrote:

Gemini wrote:

IoJovi wrote:TFA doesn't tell you who her parents are - only who they aren't.  This is done several ways; first through her conversation with Maz (family isn't coming back, and belonging is ahead), and second, the sexual subtext between her and Kylo.  

I think it's very possible she's a Kenobi, but I wouldn't go as far to say TFA showed us that without a doubt.  

@IoJovi

I see where people are coming from and I agree that it's not 100 percent clear to many.

personalky I'm just confident with what film language is trying to say and I saw it immediately, in my own personal opinion, I would definitely say that the ending revealed who she is without saying a word. A scene can speak volumes and not a single word need be said. To me it's 100 percent set in stone with that ending. The film technique used there in regards to the saga does not allow it to mean anything else imo. I just can't see how it can.

I can't see why Daisy would say tfa answers a lot about her lineage if it didn't. It answers nothing with her parents so she can't mean that imo. She must mean the ending and other parallels.

@Gemini

While I'm open to any parentage reveal for Rey as long as it's a good story, I do admit Daisy Ridley stating clues to her parentage being in TFA bodes well for the Kenobi theory, particularly if you think about the very last scene.

Then again, like others have said here, it could just be how she was coached and it's a way to keep people talking.  

Of course the Reywalkers will jump all over this too *eyeroll*.

While I'm still not 100℅ sold on Kenobi (or any parentage theory, really), I do understand it feels to so adamntly know how the story is going to go, only to have others tell you you're seeing things.  I saw Rogue One this week with a fanboy friend of mine.  While I know in my heart of hearts Reylo is the solid end game for the trilogy, my friend insists we saw two different movies.  He thinks I'm insane for even contemplating it, let alone being so sure.  

I have presented to him all of the facts, clues, hints, reasoning, etc.  and his only response is that it won't happen because he doesn't want that.  

I'm not saying that's what's happening here when we debate parentage theories, but I do understand how you feel.  

@IoJovi
This happened to me too! I have friends who do not buy the idea of Reylo, nor like all the theories I present. I'd like to see their faces when Reylo happens and ReySkywalker sink like the Titanic (I remembered a similar comment from Daisy ... this one I liked!) ... I love the actress Daisy, but there are some comments that unfortunately bring a lot of argument to The antis, and it saddens me ...

@Magnolia_3.0

Exactly!  And it becomes even more frustrating when Reylo gets more and more in your face and obvious with every viewing.  

What's even worse, the counter arguments usually go about as deep as "I don't want that", "He killed Han" or "But they're related (insert call back to OT example here.)

@IoJovi


More evident than all the clues that were released, only if they had kissed there on the cliff .... but as I imagine this would not be worthy of a decent fairy tale ... stayed for the next ... lolol
I see evidence everywhere ... even in Lego!

In this week's ntip, Jason Ward says he's still not seeing any evidence that Rey and Luke leave Ahch-To. No mention of Kylo which is interesting, since we know he ends up on the island too. 

Episode VIII spoiler discussion about the little puffin critters starts around 15 minutes in
http://makingstarwars.net/2016/12/episode-162-makingstarwars-nets-now-this-is-podcasting/

BastilaBey wrote:In this week's ntip, Jason Ward says he's still not seeing any evidence that Rey and Luke leave Ahch-To. No mention of Kylo which is interesting, since we know he ends up on the island too. 

Episode VIII spoiler discussion about the little puffin critters starts around 15 minutes in
http://makingstarwars.net/2016/12/episode-162-makingstarwars-nets-now-this-is-podcasting/

@BastilaBey

Aside from the mention of Daisy filming with John Boyega during Prince William and Harry's visit to the set (and there's doubt around what was going on in there and if it was her or KMT) she seems to have spent the rest of the time filming with Mark Hamill and Adam (at least for the Ireland stuff and presumably the stuff filmed in the studios for that segment).

AD seemed to be mostly filming at the same time as Mark and Daisy but we know nothing about the First Order stuff in VIII, so he's probably filmed scenes with Snoke etc.

If Luke and Rey do stay on Ahch-To for most, if not the entire movie, there's got to be more to it than Jedi training. Again, people are taking what happened with Luke's training with Yoda during TESB and expecting this to be like that, but add Kylo into the mix (and the KoR) and that tree/Jedi temple thingy and it looks much different!

BastilaBey wrote:In this week's ntip, Jason Ward says he's still not seeing any evidence that Rey and Luke leave Ahch-To. No mention of Kylo which is interesting, since we know he ends up on the island too. 

Episode VIII spoiler discussion about the little puffin critters starts around 15 minutes in
http://makingstarwars.net/2016/12/episode-162-makingstarwars-nets-now-this-is-podcasting/

@BastilaBey

That's interesting. To me "no evidence" simply points to him not being aware of anything that they filmed outside of Ireland or an Ahch-To set.

If (and I say this with a huge lump of salt) Luke and Rey never leave Ahch-To and Kylo does, does that mean that Kylo steals the Falcon to leave? (Assuming that Kylo's ship crashed and that he is, indeed, stranded.)

If we get to see Kylo piloting the Falcon in Ep VIII, I'm gonna get so giddy, lol. After that deleted scene from TFA, I so badly want to see Kylo on the Falcon.

Mrs Ben Solo wrote:

BastilaBey wrote:In this week's ntip, Jason Ward says he's still not seeing any evidence that Rey and Luke leave Ahch-To. No mention of Kylo which is interesting, since we know he ends up on the island too. 

Episode VIII spoiler discussion about the little puffin critters starts around 15 minutes in
http://makingstarwars.net/2016/12/episode-162-makingstarwars-nets-now-this-is-podcasting/

@BastilaBey

Aside from the mention of Daisy filming with John Boyega during Prince William and Harry's visit to the set (and there's doubt around what was going on in there and if it was her or KMT) she seems to have spent the rest of the time filming with Mark Hamill and Adam (at least for the Ireland stuff and presumably the stuff filmed in the studios for that segment).

AD seemed to be mostly filming at the same time as Mark and Daisy but we know nothing about the First Order stuff in VIII, so he's probably filmed scenes with Snoke etc.

If Luke and Rey do stay on Ahch-To for most, if not the entire movie, there's got to be more to it than Jedi training. Again, people are taking what happened with Luke's training with Yoda during TESB and expecting this to be like that, but add Kylo into the mix (and the KoR) and that tree/Jedi temple thingy and it looks much different!

@Mrs Ben Solo

Right. The only evidence we had of John and Daisy filming together was that thing with the Princes, and for all we know, that was for a charity skit (it sort of sounds like it was).

It did seem like most of Daisy's filming involved Mark (and to a lesser extent, Adam). However, I do recall a stretch where Daisy was still filming as production was winding down. If I recall, Mark and John had both posted that they had "wrapped". Adam appeared to be in NY at the time that this was going on, so it would seem that Daisy has a set of scenes not involving Mark, Adam (or John). Now who knows what the context of those scenes are or where they would fall in the movie.

And to be fair, I'm sure we all remember that KMT was the last cast member to "wrap" and was filming after all of the other main cast members had already wrapped.

IoJovi wrote:

Irina de France wrote:I don't really see how Daisy's quote points to her parentage. I mean, the article leads the readers to believe that "DR said her parentage was pretty obvious in TFA", but honestly, Daisy just said "something" she often gets asked about was actually pretty obvious in the movie. Her parentage isn't the only question raised about her, even if it's the most common. It could be anything, imho.

@Irina de France

I just reread it and sure as sith, you are right. Rey's parentage wasn't the only thing hidden inside the mystery box. She could be pointing directly at Reylo with this quote as well.

I mean, if you see the attraction between those two characters, then it's a given Luke and Leia aren't her parents. Yet so many came out sure as can be about Reywalker...

@IoJovi

Yes and I just don't get it. I'm convinced most of them went in already sure that she had to be a Skywalker. Because I had no expectations and definitely saw no hints of her being related to anyone.

Also I think some articles put a Reywalker spin on Daisy's comments even though she's said nothing of the sort.

OT but I recently watched TFA with Rey Solo goggles on for the heck of it and it makes the movie look hilariously awful. Nothing makes sense and the interrogation scene looks extremely awkward and creepy. I don't know how people can still think she's a Solo.

ISeeAnIsland wrote:

Mrs Ben Solo wrote:

BastilaBey wrote:In this week's ntip, Jason Ward says he's still not seeing any evidence that Rey and Luke leave Ahch-To. No mention of Kylo which is interesting, since we know he ends up on the island too. 

Episode VIII spoiler discussion about the little puffin critters starts around 15 minutes in
http://makingstarwars.net/2016/12/episode-162-makingstarwars-nets-now-this-is-podcasting/

@BastilaBey

Aside from the mention of Daisy filming with John Boyega during Prince William and Harry's visit to the set (and there's doubt around what was going on in there and if it was her or KMT) she seems to have spent the rest of the time filming with Mark Hamill and Adam (at least for the Ireland stuff and presumably the stuff filmed in the studios for that segment).

AD seemed to be mostly filming at the same time as Mark and Daisy but we know nothing about the First Order stuff in VIII, so he's probably filmed scenes with Snoke etc.

If Luke and Rey do stay on Ahch-To for most, if not the entire movie, there's got to be more to it than Jedi training. Again, people are taking what happened with Luke's training with Yoda during TESB and expecting this to be like that, but add Kylo into the mix (and the KoR) and that tree/Jedi temple thingy and it looks much different!

@Mrs Ben Solo

Right. The only evidence we had of John and Daisy filming together was that thing with the Princes, and for all we know, that was for a charity skit (it sort of sounds like it was).

It did seem like most of Daisy's filming involved Mark (and to a lesser extent, Adam). However, I do recall a stretch where Daisy was still filming as production was winding down. If I recall, Mark and John had both posted that they had "wrapped". Adam appeared to be in NY at the time that this was going on, so it would seem that Daisy has a set of scenes not involving Mark, Adam (or John). Now who knows what the context of those scenes are or where they would fall in the movie.

And to be fair, I'm sure we all remember that KMT was the last cast member to "wrap" and was filming after all of the other main cast members had already wrapped.

@ISeeAnIsland

Mark was still filming too after people thought he'd wrapped. He tweeted after it was reported he'd wrapped saying he was splitting his days between Ep VIII and another thing he was working on. Daisy did seem to do a day or two on her own, but as the lead character it would be expected that she'd have a few solo scenes/challenges even during time Luke (and possibly) Kylo were on Ahch-To.

Mrs Ben Solo wrote:

BastilaBey wrote:In this week's ntip, Jason Ward says he's still not seeing any evidence that Rey and Luke leave Ahch-To. No mention of Kylo which is interesting, since we know he ends up on the island too. 

Episode VIII spoiler discussion about the little puffin critters starts around 15 minutes in
http://makingstarwars.net/2016/12/episode-162-makingstarwars-nets-now-this-is-podcasting/

@BastilaBey

Aside from the mention of Daisy filming with John Boyega during Prince William and Harry's visit to the set (and there's doubt around what was going on in there and if it was her or KMT) she seems to have spent the rest of the time filming with Mark Hamill and Adam (at least for the Ireland stuff and presumably the stuff filmed in the studios for that segment).

AD seemed to be mostly filming at the same time as Mark and Daisy but we know nothing about the First Order stuff in VIII, so he's probably filmed scenes with Snoke etc.

If Luke and Rey do stay on Ahch-To for most, if not the entire movie, there's got to be more to it than Jedi training. Again, people are taking what happened with Luke's training with Yoda during TESB and expecting this to be like that, but add Kylo into the mix (and the KoR) and that tree/Jedi temple thingy and it looks much different!

@Mrs Ben Solo

Daisy filmed with John? That means they're together at the end of the movie and they left Ach-To. Doubt Kylo would be with them but then where is he. His shuttle crashed at Ach-To but don't think he'll work with them just yet beacuse as Carrie said he'll go darker and from what we heard he's going to kill them and maybe pursuing something else in that Jedi temple.

DarthRen wrote:

Mrs Ben Solo wrote:

BastilaBey wrote:In this week's ntip, Jason Ward says he's still not seeing any evidence that Rey and Luke leave Ahch-To. No mention of Kylo which is interesting, since we know he ends up on the island too. 

Episode VIII spoiler discussion about the little puffin critters starts around 15 minutes in
http://makingstarwars.net/2016/12/episode-162-makingstarwars-nets-now-this-is-podcasting/

@BastilaBey

Aside from the mention of Daisy filming with John Boyega during Prince William and Harry's visit to the set (and there's doubt around what was going on in there and if it was her or KMT) she seems to have spent the rest of the time filming with Mark Hamill and Adam (at least for the Ireland stuff and presumably the stuff filmed in the studios for that segment).

AD seemed to be mostly filming at the same time as Mark and Daisy but we know nothing about the First Order stuff in VIII, so he's probably filmed scenes with Snoke etc.

If Luke and Rey do stay on Ahch-To for most, if not the entire movie, there's got to be more to it than Jedi training. Again, people are taking what happened with Luke's training with Yoda during TESB and expecting this to be like that, but add Kylo into the mix (and the KoR) and that tree/Jedi temple thingy and it looks much different!

@Mrs Ben Solo

Daisy filmed with John? That means they're together at the end of the movie and they left Ach-To. Doubt Kylo would be with them but then where is he. His shuttle crashed at Ach-To but don't think he'll work with them just yet beacuse as Carrie said he'll go darker and from what we heard he's going to kill them and maybe pursuing something else in that Jedi temple.

@DarthRen

I believe that John may have been filming with KMT during this time.

If I remember correctly, Daisy and John may have been there together to meet the Royal Family. It's all here-say at this point, so who really know...

@DarthRen All we know for sure is that Daisy was present for the Royal visit when it was reported that something was filmed with Princes William and Harry dressed as Stormtroopers. I believe it was said to be a lift scene with John Boyega, the two Stormtroopers, and possibly Daisy, although it could have been KMT.

It is quite a leap to take that snippet of information and say that Rey and Finn must have been reunited at the end of the movie. There is no other corroboration that they filmed anything together as far as I'm aware.